↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Clonidine for pain in non-ventilated infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Clonidine for pain in non-ventilated infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013104.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olga Romantsik, Maria Grazia Calevo, Elisabeth Norman, Matteo Bruschettini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 62 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 66 48%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,284,353
of 19,233,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,540
of 11,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,534
of 287,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,233,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.