↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Clonidine for pain in non‐ventilated infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Clonidine for pain in non‐ventilated infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013104.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olga Romantsik, Maria Grazia Calevo, Elisabeth Norman, Matteo Bruschettini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Other 13 6%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 120 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 127 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,458,221
of 26,086,865 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,844
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,796
of 404,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#137
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,086,865 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.