↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
472 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009899
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J Page, Denise O'Connor, Veronica Pitt, Nicola Massy-Westropp

Abstract

Non-surgical treatment, including exercises and mobilisation, has been offered to people experiencing mild to moderate symptoms arising from carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, the effectiveness and duration of benefit from exercises and mobilisation for this condition remain unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 462 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 89 19%
Student > Bachelor 86 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 9%
Student > Postgraduate 35 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 7%
Other 102 22%
Unknown 84 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 193 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 83 18%
Psychology 17 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 3%
Sports and Recreations 13 3%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 100 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2018.
All research outputs
#858,962
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,245
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,399
of 132,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.