↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
578 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009899
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J Page, Denise O'Connor, Veronica Pitt, Nicola Massy‐Westropp

Abstract

Non-surgical treatment, including exercises and mobilisation, has been offered to people experiencing mild to moderate symptoms arising from carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, the effectiveness and duration of benefit from exercises and mobilisation for this condition remain unknown.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 578 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 569 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 96 17%
Student > Bachelor 95 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 7%
Student > Postgraduate 37 6%
Other 126 22%
Unknown 139 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 213 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 95 16%
Psychology 20 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 3%
Sports and Recreations 15 3%
Other 64 11%
Unknown 155 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,509,191
of 25,390,203 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,267
of 12,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,463
of 178,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.