↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for tobacco cessation in the dental setting

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for tobacco cessation in the dental setting
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005084.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan B Carr, Jon Ebbert

Abstract

Tobacco use has significant adverse effects on oral health. Oral health professionals in the dental office or community setting have a unique opportunity to increase tobacco abstinence rates among tobacco users.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 257 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 40 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Researcher 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 54 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 46%
Psychology 20 8%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 65 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#543,887
of 21,738,040 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,105
of 12,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,645
of 143,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,738,040 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,099 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.