↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin D, calcium or a combination of vitamin D and calcium for the treatment of nutritional rickets in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D, calcium or a combination of vitamin D and calcium for the treatment of nutritional rickets in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012581.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Moriam T Chibuzor, Diepiriye Graham-Kalio, Joy O Osaji, Martin M Meremikwu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 169 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Master 19 11%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 59 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Psychology 9 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 69 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,249,851
of 22,167,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,929
of 12,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,626
of 299,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,167,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.