| Title |
Vitamin D, calcium or a combination of vitamin D and calcium for the treatment of nutritional rickets in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012581.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Moriam T Chibuzor, Diepiriye Graham-Kalio, Joy O Osaji, Martin M Meremikwu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| South Africa | 2 | 7% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 22% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 236 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 111 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Psychology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 126 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,189,837
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,571
of 12,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,112
of 377,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.