↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Spectacle correction versus no spectacles for prevention of strabismus in hyperopic children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Spectacle correction versus no spectacles for prevention of strabismus in hyperopic children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007738.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Jones-Jordan, Xue Wang, Roberta W Scherer, Donald O Mutti

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 120 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Unspecified 12 10%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 42 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 21%
Unspecified 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 46 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,348,967
of 23,920,246 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,993
of 12,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,749
of 373,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,920,246 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.