↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Spectacle correction versus no spectacles for prevention of strabismus in hyperopic children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Spectacle correction versus no spectacles for prevention of strabismus in hyperopic children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007738.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Jones-Jordan, Xue Wang, Roberta W Scherer, Donald O Mutti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 90 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 29 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Psychology 5 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Linguistics 3 3%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 32 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,356,272
of 19,557,897 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,050
of 11,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,324
of 290,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,557,897 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.