| Title |
Spectacle correction versus no spectacles for prevention of strabismus in hyperopic children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007738.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Jones-Jordan, Xue Wang, Roberta W Scherer, Donald O Mutti |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,348,967
of 23,920,246 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,993
of 12,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,749
of 373,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,920,246 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.