↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
303 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
732 Mendeley
Title
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Houghton, Pauline Meskell, Hannah Delaney, Mike Smalle, Claire Glenton, Andrew Booth, Xin Hui S Chan, Declan Devane, Linda M Biesty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 303 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 732 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 732 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 107 15%
Student > Bachelor 94 13%
Researcher 85 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 6%
Other 167 23%
Unknown 189 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 189 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 119 16%
Social Sciences 39 5%
Psychology 19 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 2%
Other 130 18%
Unknown 221 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 226. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#91,083
of 17,687,978 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#175
of 11,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,143
of 283,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,687,978 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.