↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
265 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
551 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1522 Mendeley
Title
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers’ adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Houghton, Pauline Meskell, Hannah Delaney, Mike Smalle, Claire Glenton, Andrew Booth, Xin Hui S Chan, Declan Devane, Linda M Biesty

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 265 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,522 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1522 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 198 13%
Student > Bachelor 162 11%
Researcher 139 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 5%
Student > Postgraduate 78 5%
Other 296 19%
Unknown 566 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 292 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 246 16%
Social Sciences 66 4%
Psychology 34 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 2%
Other 238 16%
Unknown 620 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 210. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#192,034
of 25,981,448 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#317
of 13,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,484
of 406,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,981,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.