↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010529.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Dipper, Hayley E Jones, Rahul Bhatnagar, Nancy J Preston, Nick Maskell, Amelia O Clive

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 231 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Other 17 7%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 78 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 10%
Psychology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 78 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,428,973
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,283
of 12,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,226
of 374,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.