↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
40 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
Title
Vaginal preparation with antiseptic solution before cesarean section for preventing postoperative infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007892.pub7
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M Haas, Sarah Morgan, Karenrose Contreras, Savannah Kimball

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 184 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 76 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Unspecified 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 83 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#853,105
of 21,467,161 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,915
of 12,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,850
of 296,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,467,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.