| Title |
Vitamin C supplementation for prevention and treatment of pneumonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013134.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zahra Ali Padhani, Zorays Moazzam, Alina Ashraf, Hasana Bilal, Rehana A Salam, Jai K Das, Zulfiqar A Bhutta |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 16 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 47 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 23% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 50 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 59 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#513,421
of 24,416,081 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#933
of 12,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,147
of 379,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,416,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.