↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Indocyanine green angiography for preventing postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Indocyanine green angiography for preventing postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013280.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Pruimboom, Rutger M Schols, Sander MJ Van Kuijk, René RWJ Van der Hulst, Shan S Qiu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 26 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 32 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#11,968,729
of 19,539,469 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,955
of 11,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,282
of 290,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,539,469 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.