↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Indocyanine green angiography for preventing postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Indocyanine green angiography for preventing postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013280.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Pruimboom, Rutger M Schols, Sander MJ Van Kuijk, René RWJ Van der Hulst, Shan S Qiu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 104 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Other 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 38 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 44 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,788,387
of 22,609,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,469
of 12,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,273
of 299,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,609,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.