| Title |
Indocyanine green angiography for preventing postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013280.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Pruimboom, Rutger M Schols, Sander MJ Van Kuijk, René RWJ Van der Hulst, Shan S Qiu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 52 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 60 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,417,373
of 24,240,330 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,070
of 12,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,625
of 378,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,240,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.