↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hand cleaning with ash for reducing the spread of viral and bacterial infections: a rapid review

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
110 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Hand cleaning with ash for reducing the spread of viral and bacterial infections: a rapid review
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asger Sand Paludan-Müller, Kim Boesen, Irma Klerings, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Klaus Munkholm

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 192 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 17%
Student > Master 20 10%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 11 6%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 56 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 64 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#300,387
of 17,585,248 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#642
of 11,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,705
of 283,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,585,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.