↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Regular long‐term red blood cell transfusions for managing chronic chest complications in sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Regular long‐term red blood cell transfusions for managing chronic chest complications in sickle cell disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008360.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lise J Estcourt, Sally Hopewell, Marialena Trivella, Ian R Hambleton, Gavin Cho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 214 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 8 4%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 92 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 96 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,572,011
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,396
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,298
of 376,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#150
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.