The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007209.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth L Sampson, Bridget Candy, Louise Jones |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 17% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 19% |
| Scientists | 6 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 607 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 587 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 87 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 14% |
| Researcher | 65 | 11% |
| Other | 49 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 7% |
| Other | 145 | 24% |
| Unknown | 139 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 233 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 88 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 4% |
| Psychology | 22 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 9% |
| Unknown | 163 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#868,494
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,553
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,012
of 109,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.