↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
34 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
401 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
602 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Enteral tube feeding for older people with advanced dementia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007209.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth L Sampson, Bridget Candy, Louise Jones

Abstract

The use of enteral tube feeding for patients with advanced dementia who have poor nutritional intake is common. In one US survey 34% of 186,835 nursing home residents with advanced cognitive impairment were tube fed. Potential benefits or harms of this practice are unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 602 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 582 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 15%
Student > Bachelor 82 14%
Researcher 64 11%
Other 49 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 7%
Other 152 25%
Unknown 126 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 232 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 95 16%
Social Sciences 26 4%
Psychology 22 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 3%
Other 55 9%
Unknown 152 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2021.
All research outputs
#839,780
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,620
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,967
of 107,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.