↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride) versus heparin intermittent flushing for the prevention of occlusion in long‐term central venous catheters in infants and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride) versus heparin intermittent flushing for the prevention of occlusion in long‐term central venous catheters in infants and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010996.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie K Bradford, Rachel M Edwards, Raymond J Chan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 226 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Other 17 8%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 117 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 121 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,074,169
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,333
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,759
of 410,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.