↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008649.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah J Nevitt, Judith Thornton, Clare S Murray, Tiffany Dwyer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 146 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 55 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Psychology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 62 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#12,153,601
of 21,016,241 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,705
of 12,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,443
of 295,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,016,241 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.