↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
Title
Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003879.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hossein Ghaeminia, Marloes EL Nienhuijs, Verena Toedtling, John Perry, Marcia Tummers, Theo JM Hoppenreijs, Wil JM Van der Sanden, Theodorus G Mettes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 238 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 17%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 3%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 92 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Unspecified 7 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 98 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#574,418
of 21,392,919 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,198
of 12,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,299
of 297,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,392,919 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.