↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
45 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
425 Mendeley
Title
Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003879.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hossein Ghaeminia, Marloes EL Nienhuijs, Verena Toedtling, John Perry, Marcia Tummers, Theo JM Hoppenreijs, Wil JM Van der Sanden, Theodorus G Mettes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 425 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 424 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 14%
Student > Bachelor 41 10%
Unspecified 37 9%
Student > Postgraduate 37 9%
Researcher 24 6%
Other 76 18%
Unknown 149 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 165 39%
Unspecified 37 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 3%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Philosophy 7 2%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 158 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#449,493
of 23,962,691 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#825
of 12,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,918
of 384,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,962,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.