↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
43 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
496 Mendeley
Title
Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease‐free impacted wisdom teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003879.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hossein Ghaeminia, Marloes El Nienhuijs, Verena Toedtling, John Perry, Marcia Tummers, Theo Jm Hoppenreijs, Wil Jm Van der Sanden, Theodorus G Mettes

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 496 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 495 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 13%
Student > Bachelor 46 9%
Unspecified 33 7%
Student > Postgraduate 29 6%
Researcher 26 5%
Other 88 18%
Unknown 212 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 176 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 5%
Unspecified 24 5%
Social Sciences 11 2%
Psychology 6 1%
Other 32 6%
Unknown 220 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#521,799
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#871
of 13,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,937
of 416,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.