↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Indoor salt water baths followed by artificial ultraviolet B light for chronic plaque psoriasis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Indoor salt water baths followed by artificial ultraviolet B light for chronic plaque psoriasis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011941.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Peinemann, Marco Harari, Sandra Peternel, Thalia Chan, David Chan, Alexander M Labeit, Thilo Gambichler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 125 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 6 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 49 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Psychology 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 51 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,055,787
of 22,496,028 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,724
of 12,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,203
of 300,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,496,028 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.