| Title |
In-bag manual versus uncontained power morcellation for laparoscopic myomectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013352.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fulvio Zullo, Roberta Venturella, Antonio Raffone, Gabriele Saccone |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#14,195,280
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,367
of 12,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,767
of 382,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#161
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.