↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
95 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
955 Mendeley
Title
Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007471.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie J Woodley, Peter Lawrenson, Rhianon Boyle, June D Cody, Siv Mørkved, Ashleigh Kernohan, E Jean C Hay-Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 955 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 952 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 112 12%
Student > Master 95 10%
Researcher 56 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 6%
Other 45 5%
Other 175 18%
Unknown 419 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 183 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 176 18%
Unspecified 44 5%
Sports and Recreations 26 3%
Social Sciences 16 2%
Other 74 8%
Unknown 436 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#345,768
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#581
of 11,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,386
of 415,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.