↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
89 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
210 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
976 Mendeley
Title
Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007471.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie J Woodley, Peter Lawrenson, Rhianon Boyle, June D Cody, Siv Mørkved, Ashleigh Kernohan, E Jean C Hay-Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 976 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 973 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 117 12%
Student > Master 94 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 6%
Researcher 56 6%
Other 46 5%
Other 147 15%
Unknown 459 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 181 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 181 19%
Sports and Recreations 27 3%
Unspecified 19 2%
Social Sciences 16 2%
Other 75 8%
Unknown 477 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2024.
All research outputs
#343,655
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#578
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,138
of 416,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.