The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007471.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephanie J Woodley, Peter Lawrenson, Rhianon Boyle, June D Cody, Siv Mørkved, Ashleigh Kernohan, E Jean C Hay-Smith |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 11% |
Japan | 9 | 10% |
France | 4 | 4% |
Spain | 4 | 4% |
United States | 4 | 4% |
New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
Finland | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 52 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 77 | 87% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Scientists | 4 | 4% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 995 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 992 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 114 | 11% |
Student > Master | 95 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 6% |
Researcher | 56 | 6% |
Other | 47 | 5% |
Other | 148 | 15% |
Unknown | 476 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 184 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 181 | 18% |
Sports and Recreations | 27 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 2% |
Other | 77 | 8% |
Unknown | 494 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#356,966
of 26,442,002 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#570
of 13,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,215
of 419,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,442,002 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.