↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus late parenteral nutrition for critically ill term and late preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Early versus late parenteral nutrition for critically ill term and late preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013141.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kwi Moon, Gayatri K Athalye-Jape, Uday Rao, Shripada C Rao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 9%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 11 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 100 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Unspecified 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 110 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,236,887
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,440
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,323
of 401,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.