↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus late parenteral nutrition for critically ill term and late preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Early versus late parenteral nutrition for critically ill term and late preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013141.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kwi Moon, Gayatri K Athalye-Jape, Uday Rao, Shripada C Rao

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Unspecified 5 6%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Unspecified 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 27 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#10,582,749
of 17,009,769 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,806
of 11,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,625
of 283,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,009,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.