↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
79 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
832 Mendeley
Title
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011621.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jos H Verbeek, Blair Rajamaki, Sharea Ijaz, Riitta Sauni, Elaine Toomey, Bronagh Blackwood, Christina Tikka, Jani H Ruotsalainen, F Selcen Kilinc Balci

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 832 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 832 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 102 12%
Student > Bachelor 99 12%
Researcher 79 9%
Other 58 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 5%
Other 192 23%
Unknown 257 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 236 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 110 13%
Unspecified 28 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 3%
Social Sciences 18 2%
Other 139 17%
Unknown 280 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#545,911
of 25,243,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#979
of 13,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,827
of 392,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,243,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.