↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

A comparison of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009880.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arturo J Martí-Carvajal, Mark Dayer, Lucieni O Conterno, Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay, Cristina Elena Martí-Amarista

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Master 25 13%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 10 5%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 76 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Unspecified 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 80 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,373,925
of 22,206,850 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,751
of 12,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,200
of 305,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,206,850 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.