The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Oral galactagogues (natural therapies or drugs) for increasing breast milk production in mothers of non‐hospitalised term infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011505.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siew Cheng Foong, May Loong Tan, Wai Cheng Foong, Lisa A Marasco, Jacqueline J Ho, Joo Howe Ong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 47 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 11% |
| Scientists | 6 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 587 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 587 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 11% |
| Researcher | 45 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 99 | 17% |
| Unknown | 280 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 79 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 17 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 64 | 11% |
| Unknown | 297 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2024.
All research outputs
#466,777
of 26,238,332 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#781
of 13,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,477
of 427,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,238,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.