↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Factors influencing the uptake and use of nicotine replacement therapy and e‐cigarettes in pregnant women who smoke: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
122 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
Title
Factors influencing the uptake and use of nicotine replacement therapy and e‐cigarettes in pregnant women who smoke: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katarzyna Campbell, Thomas Coleman-Haynes, Katharine Bowker, Sue E Cooper, Sarah Connelly, Tim Coleman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 280 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 4%
Other 11 4%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 147 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 8%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Psychology 9 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 162 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#466,128
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#817
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,673
of 426,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.