| Title |
Factors influencing the uptake and use of nicotine replacement therapy and e‐cigarettes in pregnant women who smoke: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katarzyna Campbell, Thomas Coleman-Haynes, Katharine Bowker, Sue E Cooper, Sarah Connelly, Tim Coleman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 13% |
| France | 13 | 11% |
| United States | 12 | 10% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 5 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 53 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 83% |
| Scientists | 11 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 257 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 12% |
| Unknown | 126 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 140 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#462,289
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#817
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,680
of 425,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.