↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Factors influencing the uptake and use of nicotine replacement therapy and e-cigarettes in pregnant women who smoke: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
124 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Factors influencing the uptake and use of nicotine replacement therapy and e-cigarettes in pregnant women who smoke: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katarzyna Campbell, Thomas Coleman-Haynes, Katharine Bowker, Sue E Cooper, Sarah Connelly, Tim Coleman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 7 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 36 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 7 6%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 43 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2021.
All research outputs
#307,316
of 18,711,851 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#619
of 11,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,703
of 297,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,711,851 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.