↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
51 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
Title
Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005950.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth E Barclay, Ted J Stevenson, William Poluha, Brenda Semenko, Julie Schubert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 365 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 7%
Researcher 23 6%
Other 16 4%
Other 46 13%
Unknown 166 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 63 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 13%
Neuroscience 15 4%
Sports and Recreations 8 2%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 182 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#790,986
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,495
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,110
of 428,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.