↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
58 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005950.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth E Barclay, Ted J Stevenson, William Poluha, Brenda Semenko, Julie Schubert

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 264 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 15%
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Researcher 17 6%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 104 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 52 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 13%
Neuroscience 10 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 3%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 119 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#646,500
of 22,472,572 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,322
of 12,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,777
of 308,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,472,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.