↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
50 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
Title
Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005950.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth E Barclay, Ted J Stevenson, William Poluha, Brenda Semenko, Julie Schubert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 386 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 12%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 7%
Researcher 24 6%
Other 16 4%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 181 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 64 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 13%
Neuroscience 16 4%
Sports and Recreations 8 2%
Engineering 8 2%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 199 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#812,890
of 25,930,027 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,458
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,418
of 430,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.