↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
59 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005950.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth E Barclay, Ted J Stevenson, William Poluha, Brenda Semenko, Julie Schubert

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 23%
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 31 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 19%
Engineering 6 4%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 37 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#550,036
of 17,854,173 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,300
of 11,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,080
of 295,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,854,173 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.