↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Growth hormone therapy for people with thalassaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
Title
Growth hormone therapy for people with thalassaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012284.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chin Fang Ngim, Nai Ming Lai, Janet Yh Hong, Shir Ley Tan, Amutha Ramadas, Premala Muthukumarasamy, Meow-Keong Thong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 229 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Student > Master 19 8%
Other 10 4%
Student > Postgraduate 9 4%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 108 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 113 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,236,887
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,440
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,732
of 430,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#114
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.