↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010858.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe, Adinegara BL Abas, Nan Nitra Than, Han Ni, Jaspal Singh, Abdul Razzak Bin Mohd Said, Ifeyinwa Osunkwo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 18%
Student > Master 23 16%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 47 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 50 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,134,697
of 17,625,695 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,798
of 11,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,533
of 294,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,625,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.