| Title |
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010858.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe, Adinegara BL Abas, Nan Nitra Than, Han Ni, Jaspal Singh, Abdul Razzak Bin Mohd Said, Ifeyinwa Osunkwo |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Russia | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 313 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 18% |
| Unknown | 136 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 147 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,843,839
of 24,090,847 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,124
of 12,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,584
of 398,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#74
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,090,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.