↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D supplementation for sickle cell disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010858.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Htoo Htoo Kyaw Soe, Adinegara Bl Abas, Nan Nitra Than, Han Ni, Jaspal Singh, Abdul Razzak Bin Mohd Said, Ifeyinwa Osunkwo

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 344 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 13%
Student > Master 37 11%
Other 19 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 4%
Researcher 13 4%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 165 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 177 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,668,776
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,276
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,951
of 431,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.