The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Repositioning for pressure injury prevention in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009958.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brigid M Gillespie, Rachel M Walker, Sharon L Latimer, Lukman Thalib, Jennifer A Whitty, Elizabeth McInnes, Wendy P Chaboyer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 30% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Timor-Leste | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 26% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 448 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 5% |
| Researcher | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 60 | 13% |
| Unknown | 232 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 97 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 8% |
| Unknown | 241 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,462,960
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,934
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,338
of 437,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.