↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Follow‐up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
343 Mendeley
Title
Follow‐up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001768.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivan Moschetti, Michela Cinquini, Matteo Lambertini, Alessia Levaggi, Alessandro Liberati

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 343 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 340 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Researcher 30 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 9%
Other 16 5%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 132 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 10%
Psychology 18 5%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 143 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,875,702
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,579
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,551
of 354,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.