↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chlorproguanil‐dapsone for treating uncomplicated malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Chlorproguanil‐dapsone for treating uncomplicated malaria
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004387.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hasifa Bukirwa, Paul Garner, Julia A Critchley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 24 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 29%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 29 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,513,792
of 25,381,384 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,646
of 12,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,275
of 75,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,384 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.