↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013002.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamara Ni hIci, Henry MP Boardman, Kamran Baig, Jody L Stafford, Cristina Cernei, Owen Bodger, Stephen Westaby

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Master 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 41 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 48 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,711,454
of 20,376,777 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,427
of 12,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,465
of 303,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,376,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.