↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin K supplementation for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin K supplementation for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008482.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanitha A Jagannath, Vidhu Thaker, Anne B Chang, Amy I Price

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 65 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 72 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,899,246
of 18,047,439 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,203
of 11,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,345
of 296,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,047,439 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.