↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin K supplementation for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin K supplementation for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008482.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanitha A Jagannath, Vidhu Thaker, Anne B Chang, Amy I Price

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 183 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Researcher 16 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 83 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 90 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,078,736
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,446
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,885
of 433,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.