↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Efficacy and safety of rapid tests to guide antibiotic prescriptions for sore throat

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
31 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and safety of rapid tests to guide antibiotic prescriptions for sore throat
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012431.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jérémie F Cohen, Jean-Yves Pauchard, Nils Hjelm, Robert Cohen, Martin Chalumeau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 13 7%
Researcher 11 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 80 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Unspecified 5 3%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 85 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,046,012
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,100
of 11,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,458
of 433,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.