↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Efficacy and safety of rapid tests to guide antibiotic prescriptions for sore throat

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and safety of rapid tests to guide antibiotic prescriptions for sore throat
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012431.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jérémie F Cohen, Jean-Yves Pauchard, Nils Hjelm, Robert Cohen, Martin Chalumeau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 29 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 33 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,029,619
of 18,057,469 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,630
of 11,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,433
of 296,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,057,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.