| Title |
Alprazolam for depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007139.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harm van Marwijk, Gideon Allick, Froukje Wegman, Arjan Bax, Ingrid I Riphagen |
| Abstract |
The 'off-label' effect of alprazolam on depression has not been systematically evaluated. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Tonga | 1 | 6% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 23% |
| Psychology | 17 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 56 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,466,518
of 24,244,537 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,145
of 12,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,440
of 167,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,244,537 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.