| Title |
Withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs in older people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012572.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily Reeve, Vanessa Jordan, Wade Thompson, Mouna Sawan, Adam Todd, Todd M Gammie, Ingrid Hopper, Sarah N Hilmer, Danijela Gnjidic |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 202 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 31 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 10% |
| Canada | 13 | 6% |
| United States | 12 | 6% |
| Australia | 9 | 4% |
| Argentina | 6 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 76 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 155 | 77% |
| Scientists | 31 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 341 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 42 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 10% |
| Researcher | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 16% |
| Unknown | 118 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 43 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 133 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#303,441
of 24,512,028 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#521
of 12,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,611
of 402,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,512,028 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.