↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Diagnostic test accuracy of jolt accentuation for headache in acute meningitis in the emergency setting

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Diagnostic test accuracy of jolt accentuation for headache in acute meningitis in the emergency setting
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012824.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masahiro Iguchi, Yoshinori Noguchi, Shungo Yamamoto, Yuu Tanaka, Hiraku Tsujimoto

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 64 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 68 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,584,366
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,409
of 13,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,619
of 434,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.