↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of neuropathic pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
223 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
Title
Combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of neuropathic pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008943.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Enrique Chaparro, Philip J Wiffen, R Andrew Moore, Ian Gilron

Abstract

Pharmacotherapy remains an important modality for the treatment of neuropathic pain. However, as monotherapy current drugs are associated with limited efficacy and dose-related side effects. Combining two or more different drugs may improve analgesic efficacy and, in some situations, reduce overall side effects (e.g. if synergistic interactions allow for dose reductions of combined drugs).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 357 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 15%
Researcher 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 10%
Student > Postgraduate 31 8%
Other 96 26%
Unknown 59 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 178 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 23 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 5%
Neuroscience 16 4%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 70 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,152,054
of 18,843,155 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,881
of 11,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,241
of 137,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,843,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.