↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of neuropathic pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
272 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
Title
Combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of neuropathic pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008943.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Enrique Chaparro, Philip J Wiffen, R Andrew Moore, Ian Gilron

Abstract

Pharmacotherapy remains an important modality for the treatment of neuropathic pain. However, as monotherapy current drugs are associated with limited efficacy and dose-related side effects. Combining two or more different drugs may improve analgesic efficacy and, in some situations, reduce overall side effects (e.g. if synergistic interactions allow for dose reductions of combined drugs).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 405 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 14%
Researcher 52 13%
Student > Bachelor 45 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 8%
Other 101 24%
Unknown 86 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 187 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 5%
Neuroscience 18 4%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 95 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,458,668
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,362
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,021
of 164,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.