↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre PL Martin-Hirsch, Gerry G Jarvis, Henry C Kitchener, Richard Lilford

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 23%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Professor 4 5%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 21 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#10,788,092
of 17,960,381 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,746
of 11,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,726
of 296,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,960,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.