| Title |
Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pierre PL Martin-Hirsch, Gerry G Jarvis, Henry C Kitchener, Richard Lilford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 22% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 36% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,486,138
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,487
of 12,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,142
of 38,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.