↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pierre PL Martin-Hirsch, Gerry G Jarvis, Henry C Kitchener, Richard Lilford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 111 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 36 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 41 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,486,138
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,487
of 12,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,142
of 38,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,395 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.