↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ventriculo-peritoneal shunting devices for hydrocephalus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Ventriculo-peritoneal shunting devices for hydrocephalus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012726.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Garegnani, Juan VA Franco, Agustín Ciapponi, Virginia Garrote, Valeria Vietto, Santiago Adalberto Portillo Medina

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Other 11 8%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 57 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 61 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,062,103
of 23,408,972 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,558
of 12,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,990
of 372,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,408,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.