↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ventriculo‐peritoneal shunting devices for hydrocephalus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
Title
Ventriculo‐peritoneal shunting devices for hydrocephalus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012726.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Garegnani, Juan Va Franco, Agustín Ciapponi, Virginia Garrote, Valeria Vietto, Santiago Adalberto Portillo Medina

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 216 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Other 18 8%
Unspecified 15 7%
Researcher 14 6%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 96 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 24%
Unspecified 15 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 101 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,483,175
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,920
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,558
of 423,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.