↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009051.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greg J Irving, John Holden, Rongrong Yang, Daniel Pope

Abstract

In many parts of the world, hepatitis A infection represents a significant cause of morbidity and socio-economic loss. Whilst hepatitis A vaccines have the potential to prevent disease, the degree of protection afforded against clinical outcomes and within different populations remains uncertain. There are two types of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine, inactivated and live attenuated. It is important to determine the efficacy and safety for both vaccine types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 25%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,211,579
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,589
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,258
of 178,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.