↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intensive case management for severe mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
11 X users
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Intensive case management for severe mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007906.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dieterich M, Irving CB, Park B, Marshall M, Marina Dieterich, Claire B Irving, Bert Park, Max Marshall, Dieterich, Marina, Irving, Claire B, Park, Bert, Marshall, Max

Abstract

Intensive Case Management (ICM) is a community based package of care, aiming to provide long term care for severely mentally ill people who do not require immediate admission. ICM evolved from two original community models of care, Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) and Case Management (CM), where ICM emphasises the importance of small caseload (less than 20) and high intensity input.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 222 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 20%
Student > Master 39 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 30%
Psychology 47 20%
Social Sciences 23 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 47 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,900,007
of 26,367,288 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,879
of 13,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,545
of 111,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.