| Title |
Probiotic treatment for women with gestational diabetes to improve maternal and infant health and well-being
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012970.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karaponi AM Okesene-Gafa, Abigail E Moore, Vanessa Jordan, Lesley McCowan, Caroline A Crowther |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Grenada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 596 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 596 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 11% |
| Researcher | 45 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 39 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 105 | 18% |
| Unknown | 248 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 41 | 7% |
| Psychology | 19 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 63 | 11% |
| Unknown | 268 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,967,107
of 24,880,704 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,272
of 12,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,107
of 405,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,880,704 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.