| Title |
Probiotic treatment for women with gestational diabetes to improve maternal and infant health and well-being
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012970.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karaponi AM Okesene-Gafa, Abigail E Moore, Vanessa Jordan, Lesley McCowan, Caroline A Crowther |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Grenada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 536 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 536 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 11% |
| Researcher | 44 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 76 | 14% |
| Unknown | 248 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 12% |
| Psychology | 18 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 44 | 8% |
| Unknown | 268 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,858,379
of 23,963,877 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,637
of 12,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,846
of 402,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,963,877 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.