↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corneal collagen cross-linking for bacterial infectious keratitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Corneal collagen cross-linking for bacterial infectious keratitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013001.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shadi A Davis, Renee Bovelle, Genie Han, John Kwagyan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 82 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 28 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Unspecified 4 5%
Psychology 2 2%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 32 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,470,436
of 18,026,194 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,024
of 11,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,459
of 298,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,026,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.