↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula-fed low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Higher versus lower protein intake in formula-fed low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003959.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanis R Fenton, Heidi Al-Wassia, Shahirose S Premji, Reg S Sauve

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 19%
Student > Master 25 18%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 35 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,805,317
of 19,174,303 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,040
of 11,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,186
of 301,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,174,303 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.