↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Skin preparation for preventing infection following caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007462.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diah R Hadiati, Mohammad Hakimi, Detty S Nurdiati, Yuko Masuzawa, Katharina da Silva Lopes, Erika Ota

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 120 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Other 17 14%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 36 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,035,267
of 17,697,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,674
of 11,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,049
of 296,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,697,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.