↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
105 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
430 Mendeley
Title
Therapeutic ultrasound for chronic low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009169.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Safoora Ebadi, Nicholas Henschke, Bijan Forogh, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari, Maurits W van Tulder, Arash Babaei-Ghazani, Ehsan Fallah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 429 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 53 12%
Student > Master 43 10%
Researcher 30 7%
Other 24 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 5%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 199 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 16%
Unspecified 12 3%
Sports and Recreations 10 2%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 34 8%
Unknown 220 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#473,539
of 26,009,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#796
of 13,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,411
of 432,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,009,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.