↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rapid diagnostic tests for plague

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Rapid diagnostic tests for plague
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013459.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Jullien, Harsha A Dissanayake, Marty Chaplin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Researcher 6 13%
Librarian 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 18 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,265,990
of 18,057,469 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,953
of 11,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,835
of 295,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,057,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.