↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rapid diagnostic tests for plague

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Rapid diagnostic tests for plague
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013459.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie Jullien, Harsha A Dissanayake, Marty Chaplin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 16 13%
Student > Master 15 13%
Other 8 7%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 43 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 22%
Unspecified 17 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 50 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,383,521
of 24,557,820 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,116
of 12,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,437
of 404,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,557,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.