↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for non-tubal ectopic pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011174.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Long, Huili Zhu, Yuanyuan Hu, Licong Shen, Jing Fu, Wei Huang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,368,171
of 17,697,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,791
of 11,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,435
of 294,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,697,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.