↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
53 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for non‐tubal ectopic pregnancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011174.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Long, Huili Zhu, Yuanyuan Hu, Licong Shen, Jing Fu, Wei Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 190 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Master 16 8%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 12 6%
Other 45 23%
Unknown 74 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Unspecified 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 81 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 412. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2023.
All research outputs
#73,469
of 25,939,391 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 13,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,699
of 434,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,939,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.