↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009510.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zaid Shalchi, Omar Mahroo, Catey Bunce, Danny Mitry

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 14 12%
Unspecified 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 31%
Unspecified 15 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 36 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,087,660
of 20,639,027 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,180
of 12,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,508
of 302,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,639,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.