↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antifungal therapy for newborn infants with invasive fungal infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Antifungal therapy for newborn infants with invasive fungal infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003953.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Clerihew, William McGuire

Abstract

A variety of antifungal drugs, drug preparations and drug combinations are available to treat newborn infants with suspected or confirmed invasive fungal infection. There is a need to assess their relative merits.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 27 31%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 21 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,856,852
of 19,016,777 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,355
of 11,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,574
of 137,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,016,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.